NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
アクセス
  • MESSAGE
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報
  • ご挨拶
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報

法情報提供

  • 全カテゴリ
  • 特許
  • 特許 (Links)
  • 商標
  • 商標 (Links)
  • 意匠
  • 意匠 (Links)
  • 著作権
  • 著作権 (Links)
  • 知財一般
  • 知財一般 (Links)
  • 法律
  • 法律 (Links)
■

2009 (Wa) 2726 (November 5, 2009) “Boots” Case

November 26,2021

Similarity of design (Infringement case) <File wrapper estoppel>

(Conclusion) It is prohibited to assert what is contradictory to what an applicant asserted during the application procedure.
⇒Defendant’s design is not Similar to the registered design. (Design right owner lost.)

Plaintiff, in their opinion during the application procedure, claimed that the applied design was not similar to the prior design by emphasizing the difference in the number of squeezed parts.
In this case, however, Plaintiffs asserts that the difference in the number of squeezed parts does not affect the aesthetic of the resistered design.
Such contradict assertion is prohibited based on File wrapper estoppel or faithful principle.

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/575/001575.pdf

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • サイトマップ
  • 利用規約
  • 免責事項
  • 個人情報保護方針
  • 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2023 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. サイトマップ
  2. 利用規約
  3. 免責事項
  1. 個人情報保護方針
  2. 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2023 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.