NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
アクセス
  • MESSAGE
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報
  • ご挨拶
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報

法情報提供

  • 全カテゴリ
  • 特許
  • 特許 (Links)
  • 商標
  • 商標 (Links)
  • 意匠
  • 意匠 (Links)
  • 著作権
  • 著作権 (Links)
  • 知財一般
  • 知財一般 (Links)
  • 法律
  • 外国 (Links)
■

<Supreme Court> 1970(Gyo-Tsu)45(March 19, 1994) “Flexible and elastic hose” Case

February 25,2022

Novelty (related to Prior designs)
Easiness to create the design

(Conclusion) Novelty should be found. The registered design is not easy to create based on Prior designs. (Design right owner won.)

 

“Similarity” of novelty should be judged from the standpoint of general consumers.
In order to refuse on grounds of lack of novelty, the design is integral with the article and (1) the article of the applied design must be identical or similar to prior designs and (2) the design itself (= the article + shape, etc.) also must be identical or similar to prior designs.
“Easiness to create” is not restricted the same or similar articles but judged based on a motif widely known in society from the standpoint of a person skilled in the art.

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/342/002342.pdf

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • サイトマップ
  • 利用規約
  • 免責事項
  • 個人情報保護方針
  • 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. サイトマップ
  2. 利用規約
  3. 免責事項
  1. 個人情報保護方針
  2. 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.