NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
アクセス
  • MESSAGE
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報
  • ご挨拶
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報

法情報提供

  • 全カテゴリ
  • 特許
  • 特許 (Links)
  • 商標
  • 商標 (Links)
  • 意匠
  • 意匠 (Links)
  • 著作権
  • 著作権 (Links)
  • 知財一般
  • 知財一般 (Links)
  • 法律
  • 法律 (Links)
■

<Osaka High Court> 2018 (Ne) 2523 = 2018 (Gyo-ke) 10181(September 5, 2019) “Inspection Lighting Apparatus” Case

June 25,2021

Easiness to create the design

(Conclusion) The registered design is not easy to create based on prior arts. (Design right owner won.)

   

If a person skilled in the art can apply prior art 2 to prior art 1, the registered design can be reached.

However, as a premise that “motivation” is require to apply a prior art to another prior art even when considering easiness to create the design just like the logic to deny inventive step of a patent invention, in this judgement it was decided that there is no “motivation” to apply the lateral design type (prior art 2) to the vertical design type (prior art 1).

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/806/002806.pdf

=<IP High Court> 2018 (Gyo-ke) 10181
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/473/002473.pdf

 

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • サイトマップ
  • 利用規約
  • 免責事項
  • 個人情報保護方針
  • 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2023 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. サイトマップ
  2. 利用規約
  3. 免責事項
  1. 個人情報保護方針
  2. 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2023 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.