NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
アクセス
  • MESSAGE
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報
  • ご挨拶
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報

法情報提供

  • 全カテゴリ
  • 特許
  • 特許 (Links)
  • 商標
  • 商標 (Links)
  • 意匠
  • 意匠 (Links)
  • 著作権
  • 著作権 (Links)
  • 知財一般
  • 知財一般 (Links)
  • 法律
  • 外国 (Links)
■

<Osaka District Court>2010 (Wa) 9966 (September 15, 2011) “Manicure nail file” Case

November 26,2021

Damages caluculation (Article 39(1))

(Conclusion) Defendant’s design is not Similar to the registered design.
(Design right owner lost.)

Article 39(1) of the Design Act (Lost profits based on a right holder’s profit)

(i) Price of the defendant’s product was much cheaper than the plaintiff’s product. (plaintiff’s product: 500 yen, defendant’s product: 100 yen)
(2) Contribution of features that are not similar to the design in question (size, presence of chains, color)
(3) Different sales routes (the defendant’s product is sold at a 100-yen shop) (4) Existence of competing products
⇒66% of the calucuated damages based on the Article 39(1) of the Design Act was eliminated as “any circumstances exist under which the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part“.

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/590/001590.pdf

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • サイトマップ
  • 利用規約
  • 免責事項
  • 個人情報保護方針
  • 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. サイトマップ
  2. 利用規約
  3. 免責事項
  1. 個人情報保護方針
  2. 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.