NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
アクセス
  • MESSAGE
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報
  • ご挨拶
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報

法情報提供

  • 全カテゴリ
  • 特許
  • 特許 (Links)
  • 商標
  • 商標 (Links)
  • 意匠
  • 意匠 (Links)
  • 著作権
  • 著作権 (Links)
  • 知財一般
  • 知財一般 (Links)
  • 法律
  • 外国 (Links)
■

<Osaka District Court> 2010 (Wa) 16066(September 20, 2012) “Hair Dryer” Case

June 25,2021

Similarity of design (Infringement case)

 (Conclusion) Defendant’s design is not Similar to the registered design. (Design right owner lost.)

Although the registered design and Defendant’s Hair dryer has common pattern in the shape of the shade portion, the essential part of the registered design is not limited to the shape of the shade portion, and the difference in the impression brought about by other differences is large.
Furthermore, even if looking at the concrete shape of the shade portion, the registered design gives a more angular impression in a substantially rectangular shape, whereas Defendant’s Hair dryer gives a more rounded impression in a substantially “oval shape” shape, giving a different impression.
⇒ non-infringement

*This judgement incudes another issue related to Unfair Competition Law.
<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/762/001762.pdf

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • サイトマップ
  • 利用規約
  • 免責事項
  • 個人情報保護方針
  • 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. サイトマップ
  2. 利用規約
  3. 免責事項
  1. 個人情報保護方針
  2. 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.