NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
アクセス
  • MESSAGE
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報
  • ご挨拶
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報

法情報提供

  • 全カテゴリ
  • 特許
  • 特許 (Links)
  • 商標
  • 商標 (Links)
  • 意匠
  • 意匠 (Links)
  • 著作権
  • 著作権 (Links)
  • 知財一般
  • 知財一般 (Links)
  • 法律
  • 外国 (Links)
■

<IP High Court> 2018 (Gyo-ke) 10152(April 11, 2019) “Electric Toothbrush” Case

June 25,2021

Novelty (related to prior arts)

(Conclusion) Novelty should not be found.(Applicant lost.)

 

General consumers, which are the main users of this designation, pay special attention to the overall shape of the gripping portion with emphasis on the easiness of gripping and operation.

Therefore, as the whole shape is common between the applied design and the prior art, they are similar to each other.

Though the applicant asserted that the difference in the number of buttons formed on the front side of the main body (small circular parts) is the main portion, such difference was not deemed the main portion in view of the publicly known designs. (Applicant asserted common patterns between the applied design and the prior art, but such assertion was rejected because not all of the common patterns were publicly known.)

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/482/002482.pdf

 

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • サイトマップ
  • 利用規約
  • 免責事項
  • 個人情報保護方針
  • 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. サイトマップ
  2. 利用規約
  3. 免責事項
  1. 個人情報保護方針
  2. 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.