NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
アクセス
  • MESSAGE
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報
  • ご挨拶
  • 事務所紹介
  • 業務内容
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • 執筆・講演情報
  • 法情報提供
  • 採用情報

法情報提供

  • 全カテゴリ
  • 特許
  • 特許 (Links)
  • 商標
  • 商標 (Links)
  • 意匠
  • 意匠 (Links)
  • 著作権
  • 著作権 (Links)
  • 知財一般
  • 知財一般 (Links)
  • 法律
  • 外国 (Links)
■

<IP High Court> 2016 (Gyo-Ke) 10034(September 21, 2016) “Frozen Dessert with Cap” Case

June 25,2021

“One application per design” (Design Act Article 7)

(Conclusion) Admitted as “One application per design” (Design right owner won.)

In order to comply with the requirements of Design Act Article 7 (“One application per design”), the design must be one product in one form.
“Frozen dessert with Cap” is considered to be composed mainly of “Frozen dessert” and accompanied by “Cap” from its name.
In every stage of manufacture, distribution, and use, the “Frozen dessert” is an integral condition that is filled into “Cap” and cooled or consolidated.
It is not easy to separate the “Frozen dessert” from the “Cap” by keeping the shape.
Moreover, “Frozen dessert” is not traded normally independently of “Cap”.
Considering these overall considerations, “Frozen dessert with Cap” is, in social common sense, considered to be an product having one particular application and function, and the “Frozen dessert” does not have an application and function independently from the part of “Cap.”

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/123/002123.pdf

 

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • サイトマップ
  • 利用規約
  • 免責事項
  • 個人情報保護方針
  • 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. サイトマップ
  2. 利用規約
  3. 免責事項
  1. 個人情報保護方針
  2. 事業主行動計画

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.