NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
Access
  • MESSAGE
  • ABOUT THE FIRM
  • PRACTICES
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • PUBLICATIONS/LECTURES
  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • Message
  • ABOUT THE FIRM
  • PRACTICES
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • PUBLICATIONS/LECTURES
  • LEGAL UPDATES

Legal Updates

  • All Categories
  • Patent
  • Patent (Links)
  • Trademark
  • Trademark (Links)
  • Design
  • Design (Links)
  • Copyright
  • Copyright (Links)
  • IP
  • IP (Links)
  • Law
  • Law (Links)
■

2020(Gyo-Ke)10063 (March 25, 2021) “Antipruritic agent” Case

December 24,2021

 Registration of Patent Term Extension (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices)

(Conclusion)
Patent Term Extension is admitted.

The content of the Disposition was recognized to be different from the content of the “active ingredient” in the written approval, and the patent term extension was approved.

*In another case, the same patent was judged to be noninfringing. (Tokyo District Court 2018 (Wa) 38504)

*These decisions are not necessarily inconsistent because when arguing patent term extension, the “active ingredient” is the subject of patent term

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>

https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/947/002947.pdf

 

 

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • SITE MAP
  • TERMS OF USE
  • DISCLAIMER
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright © 2023 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. SITE MAP
  2. TERMS OF USE
  3. DISCLAIMER
  1. PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright © 2023 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.