Inventive step
(Conclusion)
Inventive step is NOT found.
In the present case, it was ruled that “arrangements on games” also required logical reasoning using publicly-known technology etc.
*The cited prior art was only one YouTube video
<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.courts.go.jp/ip/eng/assets/ip/eng/chizai_en/chizai_en-pdf-2743.pdf