NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
Access
  • MESSAGE
  • ABOUT THE FIRM
  • PRACTICES
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • PUBLICATIONS/LECTURES
  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • Message
  • ABOUT THE FIRM
  • PRACTICES
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • PUBLICATIONS/LECTURES
  • LEGAL UPDATES

Legal Updates

  • All Categories
  • Patent
  • Patent (Links)
  • Trademark
  • Trademark (Links)
  • Design
  • Design (Links)
  • Copyright
  • Copyright (Links)
  • IP
  • IP (Links)
  • Law
  • Law (Links)
■

2018(Wa)4851 (May 28, 2020) “Clamping device” Case

January 28,2022

Indirect Infringement

(Conclusion)
Indirect Infringement is admitted.

 (Patent Act 102(2))

In making a demand under the preceding paragraph, the patentee or exclusive licensee may demand measures necessary for the prevention of such infringement including the disposal of products constituting such act of infringement (including, in the case of a patented invention of a process of producing products, products produced by the act of infringement; the same shall apply in Article 102(1)) and the removal of facilities used for the act of infringement.

Indirect Infringement of Patent Act 102 (2) shall be established if a non-exceptional person is aware and accepts that there is a high probability that the product will be used for the infringement of patent rights.

*A total injunction is not an excessive injunction.

 

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>

https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/966/002966.pdf

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • SITE MAP
  • TERMS OF USE
  • DISCLAIMER
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. SITE MAP
  2. TERMS OF USE
  3. DISCLAIMER
  1. PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.