NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
Access
  • MESSAGE
  • ABOUT THE FIRM
  • PRACTICES
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • PUBLICATIONS/LECTURES
  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • Message
  • ABOUT THE FIRM
  • PRACTICES
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • PUBLICATIONS/LECTURES
  • LEGAL UPDATES

Legal Updates

  • All Categories
  • Patent
  • Patent (Links)
  • Trademark
  • Trademark (Links)
  • Design
  • Design (Links)
  • Copyright
  • Copyright (Links)
  • IP
  • IP (Links)
  • Law
  • Law (Links)
■

<Osaka District Court> 2012 (Gyo-ke) 10105, 10106, 10107, 10108, 10109, 10110(November 26, 2012) “Artificial Tooth” Case

June 25,2021

Novelty (related to prior arts)

(Conclusion) Novelty should be found. (Design right owner won.)

Since the concumers of artificial teeth are specialists like dentists, and they select artificial teeth by noticing the difference in small form, such a small difference should be also recognized by them. ⇒Not similar.

<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/720/000720.pdf

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • SITE MAP
  • TERMS OF USE
  • DISCLAIMER
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright © 2025 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. SITE MAP
  2. TERMS OF USE
  3. DISCLAIMER
  1. PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright © 2025 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.