NAKAMURA & PARTNERS
Access
  • MESSAGE
  • ABOUT THE FIRM
  • PRACTICES
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • PUBLICATIONS/LECTURES
  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • Message
  • ABOUT THE FIRM
  • PRACTICES
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • PUBLICATIONS/LECTURES
  • LEGAL UPDATES

Legal Updates

  • All Categories
  • Patent
  • Patent (Links)
  • Trademark
  • Trademark (Links)
  • Design
  • Design (Links)
  • Copyright
  • Copyright (Links)
  • IP
  • IP (Links)
  • Law
  • Law (Links)
■

<Supreme Court>1991 (Gyo-Tsu) 103 (September 10, 1993)  ”SEIKO EYE” Case

May 28,2021

Similarity (Article 4, paragraph(1), item(11) of Trademark Act)

(Conclusion:)
The Trademark should not be judged as similar to the JPO-Cited Trademark.

The JPO-Cited Trademark consists of “SEIKO”, which is the abbreviation for the products or trade name of a well-known manufacturer and seller of watches and clocks in Japan, and “EYE”, which is a general, common term closely related to eyeglasses.  Thus, no pronunciation or concept arises from the “EYE” part of the JPO-Cited Trademark which designates watches and eyeglasses.  Therefore, the Trademark is not similar to the JPO-Cited Trademark in view of appearance, pronunciation and concept.

Trademark:

JPO-Cited Trademark:

Trademark Act:
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?ft=1&re=2&dn=1&x=60&y=15&co=01&ia=03&ja=04&ky=%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E6%B3%95&page=18

<Writer: Takashi Ishido (Patent & Trademark Attorney)>
https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_en/634/001634.pdf

 
<< Prev    Next >>

  • SITE MAP
  • TERMS OF USE
  • DISCLAIMER
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.

  1. SITE MAP
  2. TERMS OF USE
  3. DISCLAIMER
  1. PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright © 2024 Nakamura & Partners All Rights Reserved.