＜Osaka District Court＞ 2006 (Wa) 3563 （November 30, 2006）”Metal product to support concrete frame” Case
Novelty (Infringement case – Invalid)
(Conclusion) Novelty should NOT be found. (Applicant lost.)
There are no differences between the prior Plaintiff’s product #100 shown in the brochure and the registered design.
<Writer: Hideki Takaishi (Attorney-at-law licensed in Japan and California)>
https://www.courts.go.jp/ip/eng/assets/ip/eng/chizai_en/chizai_en-pdf-517.pdf
