Articles on Patent

【PATENT ★★★】Supreme Court Case No. 2018 (Gyo-hi) 69; August 27, 2019

【PATENT ★★】IP High Court Case No. 2018 (Gyo-ke) 10036; March 19, 2019 (Presiding Judge MORI)

【PATENT ★】Japanese Evidence Collection Procedures in Patent Infringement Case

【PATENT ★★】IP High Court Grand Panel Case No. 2018 (Ne) 10063; June 7, 2019 (Presiding Judge TAKABE)

【PATENT ★】IP High Court Case No. 2017 (Gyo-ke) 10117; November 6, 2018 (Presiding Judge TSURUOKA)

【PATENT ★★】Osaka District Court Case No. 2016 (Wa) 6494; December 18, 2018 (Presiding Judge TANI)

【Patent ★★★】 In the “Beauty Instrument” case, the Grand Panel of the IP High Court determined the appropriateness and approach of considering the contribution rate of the patented invention for the calculation of damages under Article 102, Paragraph 1 of the Patent Act in the case where a characteristic part of the patented invention is implemented for part of the patentee’s product.

【PATENT ★】IP High Court Case No. 2017 (Gyo-ke) 10200; February 18, 2019 (Presiding Judge TSURUOKA)

【PATENT ★】Tokyo District Court Case No. 2017 (Gyo-ke) 16468; January 17, 2019 (Presiding Judge SHIBATA)＊(Intellectual High Court Case No. 2017 (Gyo-ke) 10226; December 27, 2018 in which the court rendered the decision to the same effect)

【PATENT ★★】IP High Court Case No. 2017 (Gyo-Ke) 10121; February 14, 2018 (Presiding Judge Mori)